Sunday, August 2, 2015

August 2: Part II

Sorry, part one stopped abruptly before I got to my main topic. I couldn't fix it. So I had to find a child who could.

I was talking about the horrors that the Canadian mining industry inflicts, especially in Central American and Africa.  As well, it commonly pays insignificant royalties. One firm operating a mine in northern Quebec pulled out 10 billion in sales. But paid only 226 dollars in royalties. Nor do we see much in taxes from this activity, because wealthy Canadians now have 200 billion dollars and more in offshore tax havens. And you'll notice that the Irving press never tells us how much income tax the Irvings pay.

Sure, pipelines and mines and forests will provide jobs - as long as they last. But New Brunswick pays one hell of a price for those jobs - as long as they last. And this is true all over the world. Unregulated capitalism does NOT produce wealth (except for the unregulated capitalists.). It creates poverty That's why there's a wage gap, and it's growing. - all over the world.

The world has changed a great deal since the 1960s. That was a period is which Canadians expected government to act in their interests That's how we got medicare. (except in the U.S,) War had given us the experience that the civil service knew what it was doing, and could make life better for us.

But we forgot (or never knew) the depression, the much better years that followed into the 1960s...The privately-owned news media made sure of that by using a word that sounded derogatory (bureaucracy) to describe those civil servants who knew better than private business ever did what a society requires.

The wealthy organized themselves to turn the clock back to the days of piracy as they set out to loot the world. It's the same in Canada, the U.S., China, Russia, probably India. The  wars the people of those countries fight or threaten to fight  get nothing out of them but death, misery, starvation. The wars we are seeing and and expect more of are not wars between nations   They are wars between the various groups of the very rich - with the rest of us as cannot fodder.

And they use the news media they own to control us. In fact,  the U.S. is now hiring psychologists and psychiatrists to help it make the news more effective as propaganda. You can always find a goodly number of such 'experts' in the universities who will cooperate - for a price. Millions of people  have died. Many more millions are going to die to make the rich richer.

Ultimately, we're on a self-destructive path. But the greedy and power-hungry will never know that.

Is it possible to stop this?   I'm not optimistic.   We live in a province that has been ripped off by the rich ever since the start. And the people of this province  keep voting for the Liberals and the Conservatives who, almost openly, lead the rip-offs.

Can the NDP do it? It can certainly improve things - but not, fundamentally, change them.
Real change can come only when the people demand it. But they aren't demanding much of anything; because our private news media and TV and films are very effective in turning us into zombies. And without massive public support, real change is impossible.

We have accepted what is, essentially and using the correct sense of the word, a fascist state. Indeed, we have gone farther than Mussolini did. His fascism  made the wealthy unelected part of the government. Our fascism has,gone further, making the wealthy into the government. That suited our wealthy people very nicely. That's why,back in years we  have never been told about, they gave support to Hitler and Mussolini.

It's a system that needs a direction in which the the anger and frustration of the public can be released. Donald Trump is doing well not because of any useful programme he has suggested but using Mexicans as Hitler used Jews. The American and Canadian governments are  using Muslims in the same way.

At some point the anger and hatred will release itself in riots, and even rebellions. The U.S. is ready for that. That's why its police forces have been militarized - to fight Americans. That, I strongly suspect, is why we saw a special RCMP squad  in New Brunswick wearing military camouflage and carrying combat  rifles. They weren't there to protect us. They were there to attack us if the shale owners thought it necessary.

The natural reaction of angry people is not to attack those who threaten them. It's to attack those they've been conditioned to hate. That's what Hitler was all about. Nothing like patriotism and honour and love of God to make us indiscriminate killers.

People - us - have to change. And we have to think far, far more seriously than we do about what changes we want. In New Brunswick, especially, we need to read and to talk and to debate what's going on in this world.

____________________________________________________________________________

By the way, a strange thing is happening in this federal election in Canada. But none of our eagle-eyed press seem to have noticed it. Harper's Conservatives have piles of money for the election campaign.

The NDP, of course, has very little. That's because the wealthy have never been fond of the NDP.

But - the Liberals are low on funding, too. And that's very odd.

The wealthy usually give big contributions to both Liberals and Conservatives because, after all, they're both pretty much the same, and both servants of the wealthy. So why is this election such an exception?

Because they expect the Liberals to lose? No. That makes no sense. If Harper gets only a minority, he will need the Liberals with all the seats they can muster.  Except -

What if, after this election, Harper intends to moveto  something really outrageous, but that the wealthy really, really want? Something so outrageous that even the Liberals can't support it?

What if it's a trade treaty that makes corporations so free to do whatever they want that they, in effect, become the government of Canada? And our opinions mean nothing.

But that can't be done without a Harper majority. Canada's wealthy have found our Mussolini.



                                                                                                                                                                         

August 2: Sunday odds and ends.

Yesterday, I forget to mention  the Faith Page of the Irving Press - always  inspiring and uplifting page. I was always look forward to the sermonette on this page as a key to understanding the world. And the contributing cleric does it again. This time, the message of the day, the solution to the world's problems is we must not take the Lord's name in vain. Well....

There are exceptions of course - though the writer does not mention them.The U.S. government is free to say it is God's will for the U.S. to rule the world. That's what it calls American Exceptionalism. And  we all send people to kill for God and country. Canada has some pilots doing it now. But that's  not taking God's name in vain because it's what God wants us to do. No. The preacher is taking dead aim at the real troublemakers in this world - the ones who say God Damn or  isti Christ Tabarnaque - though you can get away with the latter because God doesn't speak French. I mean, look at The Bible. It's all in English.

Incidentally, using God's name in vain, we are told, is one of the Ten Commandments. So is thou shalt not kill. So how come the sermonette is never about how we should not kill in Syria, or carry out provocative military exercises in Eastern Europe, or supply killing equipment and training in killing to Ukraine?

And how about loving thy neighbour? We live in a country which is cutting services to those of us who need help while we let the rich hide their wealth in offshore savings accounts.

Those sermonettes on the Faith Page have nothing to do with faith of any sort.
_______________________________________________________________________________
While we're on a religious theme, I was reading a couple of newspapers yesterday - one was Jewish and the other was Muslim. Both were good reads, and both gave evidence of closely related values. And both were of values more Christian than any I have seen in the Irving press - including the Faith page.

Here's Haaretz   weekend

Weekend
Analysis || Israel's meekness in the face of Jewish extremism carries a heavy price 
The terrorists who murdered Palestinian infant Ali Saad Daobasa have exacerbated the situation in the territories to its most dangerous since the last Gaza war, says Amos Harel. 
Roger Waters sets the record straight: I hate apartheid, not Israel 
Gideon Levy spent 24 hours with the former Pink Floyd singer, who has become one of the leading lights in the BDS movement. A conversation on political views, tragic family history – and when the rock star-turned-activist will be happy to play in Israel again.
Analysis ||Israel's condemnation of Pride attack is hollow
Behind the pinkwashing, it turns out that homophobia in its worst forms exists within the coalition, writes Aeyal Gross
Why we don't know how to pick our leaders
Our craving for ideology means that we are partial to ideological leaders. But we need leaders who will make smart decisions that are aligned with the public interest.
Sayed Kashua celebrates 40 and bids farewell to news
A milestone birthday is as good an opportunity as any for a midlife crisis about the Middle East crises.
Canada's 'Jewish ghetto' isn't as bad as it sounds
Hadas still struggles with the heavy Quebec accent, but her kids know four languages – Yiddish included. 
Gain a family
Learn Hebrew today and gain more than a language 
advertisement
East of U.S., Jews aren't drifting from Israel 
As Russian and Ukrainian Jews have told me, 'When Israel bombs Gaza and kills Palestinians, our neighbors here fear and respect us.'
Bertol Brecht has something to say to modern Israel
Itay Tiran as Mack the Knife is superb in this sociopolitical protest play.
Comic proportions: When Moses meets Superman
From Samson's battles to the wars of King David, a fusion of comics and 
Bible stories is the crux of this exhibition at the Israeli Cartoon Museum in Holon.
When Palestine was a sugar cane empire
Uri Malhi's sugar cane fields are a reminder of the days when sugar cane was a major crop in these parts. And in another tasty project, a designer creates fabulous new lollipops.


And here's Al Jazeera.

30 JULY 2015

THIS WEEK

Israel authorises force-feeding of prisoners
Reunion Island plane debris investigated for MH370 link
India executes plotter of deadly 1993 Mumbai bombings
Germany warns of attacks on Istanbul's public transport
Israel PM approves 300 settler homes in occupied W Bank
Afghan government says Mullah Omar dead
Bahrain arrests several suspects over deadly bombing
Saudi policeman killed in attack in Eastern Province
Is Saudi Arabia warming up to the Muslim Brotherhood?
White House rejects petition to pardon Snowden
Sweden far-right plans gay parade in mainly Muslim area
Gaddafi's son Saif al-Islam sentenced to death
'Girl aged 10' used in bombing in Nigeria's Damaturu

Clashes erupt at Jerusalem's Al-Aqsa on Jewish holiday
Q&A: 'It is possible to break the Israeli occupation'
US set to launch air strikes on ISIL from Turkey base
New app shakes up Indonesia's motorbike taxi market
EDITOR'S PICKS
'Strong evidence' of Israeli war crimes in Gaza
In a brutal assault in Rafah during 2014 Gaza war, Israeli forces purposely targeted scores of civilians, report finds.
California's drought and the battle for Medicine Lake
Plans are afoot to build power plants and frack near one of California's biggest reserves of fresh water.
Iceland women tackle rape and 'pornification'
As Iceland celebrates 100 years of women's suffrage, some women launch social media campaigns to demand more progress.
Magazine: A leap of faith
Meet the 97-year-old goddess of Haitian dance.
UK kids heading from care to jail
An alarming number of young UK offenders with criminal records were previously in the care of local authorities.
A Sino-Russian alliance to rival Europe
Faced with Western sanctions and falling oil prices, Russia bolsters ties with trade-partner to the east.
OPINIONS
WRITTEN BY ALASTAIR SLOAN
No Mr Cameron, jihadists didn't start on 9/11
Cameron's narrow historical lens and dismissal of foreign policy while explaining terrorism is inherently flawed.
WRITTEN BY GEOFFREY ARONSON
A refugee's hope: Young girl takes on Merkel
In the presence of a cold Angela Merkel, Reem Sahwil puts a human face on the refugee crisis.
WRITTEN BY REMI PIET
Romania's white knight: The EU
The narrative that the European Union disrespects democracy is a fallacy.
INFOGRAPHICS
MAJOR KURDISH FACTIONS

A close look at the most influential Kurdish groups in the Middle East spread over Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran.
MAPPING ISRAEL'S STRIKES ON GAZA

An interactive map details the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip during the 50-day assault during July and August 2014.
PROGRAMMES
Nollywood
The story behind Nigeria's domestic movie industry, the second biggest producer of films in the world.
Slaving Away
We expose the dirty secrets behind Australia's fresh food industry and the widespread exploitation of foreign workers.
FROM THE BLOGS
In Somalia, a leafless tree is marked by death
Puntland locals find themselves disturbed by haunting execution site but too frightened to ever cut it down.
Badwater: A race to breaking point in no man's land
Run widely considered the most difficult footrace in the world has taken on mythical status.

___________________________________________________________________________
Then I received a note on Canadian mining companies and slavery, rape and torture.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/14eea4ee0e5a3da3
As well, the current issue of Monitor - www.policyalternative.ca   has some very disturbing articles on how Canadian mining companies commonly destroy environments for any future survival, and commonly pay miners $30 a month. Any complaints are smothered by company police or, if necessary,  by the local army.
In El Salvador, a Canadian/Australian mining venture called Pac Rim Cayman announced plans to develop a gold mine. Now, El Salvador is a tiny and poor country with some of the worst environmental  problems in the world. Yet another mine would be the final touch. So the government refused permission. And so the mining company sued for 'lost profits' - at 

Saturday, August 1, 2015

August 1: My apologies....

I said yesterday that today I would write about the chances of peaceful change in Canada and other parts of the world. But yesterday, I thought, was Saturday. It wasn't. It was Friday. It's not my fault. My university never had a required course on how to tell which day it is. So I shall write it on Sunday which is tomorrow, right?
______________________________________________________________________________

I'm going to start today with a letter to the editor. "Government not a 'universal' provider.". This was written by an obviously intelligent (if smug) university student. It's about the high cost of university education for students - cost that s starts them off in life with a heavy debt made up by borrowing.

I chose it because it represents a)a failure to understand what university is (or should be) about, and b) a failure to understand what a society is. I expect there were letters similar to this a couple of centuries ago when we made tuition free for all children by creating public schools.

It also represents a common business approach which sees business as the only possible model for dealing with all issues.

Briefly, he writes that all investments in the future tale time to see a return.  (Oh? Check the deal that Irving got on our forests, that he got on his Halifax shipyards. Tell us about the struggles of the Irving children as they went into debt for their schooling.)

Then - it's the students who decided to go to university. So they shouldn't expect government to pay for. Right. And it's the children that decide to go to kindergarten - so they shouldn't expect all of us to pay for it.

And the gem - he writes that going to university is like going into business. So the business-like thing to do is to pick a programme that will get you a job that makes lots of money.

There are so many things wrong with this.

1. A university is not like a business. It is (or should be) about training human minds to think. The purpose of business is simply to make a profit.We need trained minds in many areas that have nothing to do with business - education, the church, social work, social programmes.. Ideally, everybody should have a chance to learn how to think because,  in a democracy, we need people who can think and vote intelligently....
2. Some, like medecine and law, do train people for specific careers. But it is not only getting the credentials these train them in. It is also the thinking processes necessary to develop scientific understanding and ethics.  (Okay. Some lawyers aren't good at the latter.)
A  society needs more, much, much more intellectual training to survive and develop.
3.  A money-making degree like business administration has little intellectual content. It's rather more like learning to drive a car. Indeed, it cramps the mind by tacitly accepting an ideology of economic development that has produced poverty and mass murder all over the world.

We don't need more businessmen. We need more people capable of intelligent thought, and with a sense of what a society is. The societies that based themselves on a business approach (like the British Empire) have crashed, just as the U.S. right now is crashing - though it is not  yet
 clear how many of the rest of us  will go in that crash.

4. Deciding to go to university is  not the simple process the writer thinks it is.  The rich just automatically go. They grow up with that expectation.  And even the really stupid rich go - like George Bush Jr. who was stoned most of the time, but still passed - and not by any native brilliance because to this day it is obvious he has no intellectual skills at all. So how did he pass? Guess.
And he got into a Master of   Business Administration programme - though his grades were too low for it. And, still stoned, he passed that!  Guess how that happened. And his very first job was CEO of an oil company. (Which went broke, but not before George got his money out. This is one captain who would never go down with the ship.

But as you go down the social scale, the pattern changes. I have never seen any evidence that the children of the rich are more intelligent than the children of the poor. But the children of the poor -= and many of the middle class - are not raised in the belief that they have any right to go to university, not even if they have good grades. They simply don't come from a background that encourages such thought.

Everything in this letter to the editor justifies a society in throwing away people who might help to develop the society, while educating only those who will exploit the society to make themselves richer. In fact, it's a clear argument for going back two centuries, and privatizing all education, making it fully  available only to those born rich.

The world leader in free public education was Scotland. Some years ago, I read a book on the 150 most important people in history. The author noted that a disproportionate number of those who made a difference in the world have been Scottish and Jewish. Neither group could be categorized as rich in historical terms. But the Jewish community has a long tradition of high respect for education and debate. And the Scots were pioneers in free public education. My highland grandfather grew up in poverty. He left school after grade six because it was essential for him to learn a trade to survive. So he was apprenticed to a tailor. He remained poor to his death. But he learned three languages at school, his native Gaelic, English and French. He also developed a love for reading from school, so he kept teaching himself all his life. He could recite Burns endlessly, and knew The Bible so well, he frequently conducted church services.

The Jewish kids I grew up with were very poor, and the Jewish district of Montreal a quite awful place. I recently had a post from one is now a lawyer, and has a PhD in history. Several are now lawyers or doctors.

It's not just rich kids who have brains. In fact, I have met few rich people who have much respect for university education. It's for social status, and possibly for 'credentials'. But that's it.

Very few of my Christian childhood friends went to university. Most never finished high school. They weren't stupid. They weren't lazy. In fact, they were exactly  the kind of people who the rich exploit by using them as cheap labour.

I didn't  spend all those years, going into debt, in university so I could teach smug, rich kids. Nor did I get rich. In fact, the years of lost revenue and the debt combined left me way back of the crowd. But I loved teaching. And I'm glad I did it. And I know that education is not "just like running a business".
______________________________________________________________________________
As you might guess from this long intro, there isn't much in the Irving press. The most interesting pages are the death notices. The silliest story in on A10. It's a report that New Brunswickers, more than any other Canadians have sex in cars. ( Of course, that could be a problem. It could be that. New Brunswickers get turned on by cars, not by sex..)

As well, people who own more than one car have more sex in them that others. People who drive larger cars, like trucks or minivans, are real sex maniacs. So are people who drive yellow cars.

There are no figures for motorcycles, bicycles, scooters or boards. So much for the news YOU need to know.
_________________________________________________________________________________
The editorialist says we have to go for an austerity programme more severely than we have. His point, in the last sentence, is that we have to fire more civil servants. Nothing in the editorial explains why that would be good or what effect it would be likely to have. Nor does it mention that maybe the rich should get a little of the austerity treatment. As usual, it' a vague and ignorant editorial. But one the boss will certainly like.  Kiss. Kiss.

Norbert writes his third or fourth editorial on the election. They all say much the same thing.

Brent Mazerolle his usual column on nothing in particular.

Gwynne Dyer's column, about Cyprus, is good. But it's not about one of the great issues of our day. That's a characteristic of the Dyer columns that appear in the Irving press. I'm pretty sure the editors pick just the ones they want us to see.

Bill Belliveau has a good article on Senate reform - if you believe the history books. They and Belliveau  claim that the Senate was created as a chamber of "second, sober thought."

It wasn't.

Canada, itself was created largely by British investors who wanted to unite the British colonies in North America so they could raise more money to help themelves build railways and other goodies. Our federal government was created to serve the interests of big business. That, and not a spiritual connection with the St. Lawrence River or a 'vision' of any sort, is what made John A. favour confederation.

But what if Canadians were ever to elect a federal government that wasn't a servant to big business?
The Senate was designed to prevent that. It was designed to block any government that might want to do foolish,wasteful things, like serving the needs of the Canadian people. It was designed for people like the Mike Duffys of this world.

I have known many senators. Some were quite nice people. But all were party hacks for whichever government appointed them. One, the daughter of a famous woman, is no great authority on anything, and has no distinguished experience. But she's a senator. Why?    Because she has the most viciously extreme right-wing views I have ever encountered. She makes the fascist Mussolini look like a sweetheart.

I'm not at all sure the Senate can be reformed. It's a deliberately anti-democratic institution. In a democracy, we would be allowed to choose the people we want to govern us. An appointed Senate doesn't allow that.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Canada&World is even more feeble than usual.
On B3, an important story gets only a short column "Harper sticks with NATO assurance mission until June". It's really about Ukraine, and Canada's commitment to train and supply Ukrainian troops and to take part in military exercises near the Russian border.

The story is we're doing it to maintain freedom and democracy in Ukraine. Very good of us. So how come we didn't invade the U.S. when it attacked Iraq? How come we didn't defend Guatemala when the U.S. massacred hundreds of thousands? Why did we help to attack Libya? Why are we helping to attack Syria? The U.S. has acted to destroy democracy in Ukraine, much of Central America, in Egypt - without a peep out of Mr. Harper.

What is the Ukraine all about? Why are we supplying troops and money? Why are we joining in the attempt to scare Russia?
Will it work? Probably not. Will it cause a world nuclear war? very possibly.

So why are we in this?

On B4, Hilary Clinton speaks in favour of lifting the U.S. trade embargo on Cuba because it would bring "dignity and democracy" to Cuba. That's funny - in a gruesome  way.

It was the U.S. that prevented dignity and democracy in Cuba for sixty years by imposing a brutal dictator on Cuba. And lifting the embargo would "advance democracy"?

Many Americans will believe that crap because they've been taught that America was the world's first democracy and that its has spread democracy all over the world. Well, it wasn't the first democracy. That was hundreds of years before there was a U.S. Perhaps even more if one studies the histories of native peoples. (As well, the U.S. revolution did NOT bring democracy. You can't have a democracy where well over half the population don't have the vote or don't own enough property to qualify, or are slaves. Some democracy!

And lifting the embargo would advance democracy? Well, the U.S. had no right to impose that embargo in the first place. So if it wanted Cuba to be democratic, why did they impose the embargo. And I can think of many, many undemocratic countries that don't have U.S. embargoes imposed on them. There's Egypt, for example, where the U.S. destroyed democracy - but there's no embargo. The same is true of much of Central America.

Then, on B7, there's a story headlined "Analysis - Afghan Government hopes to divide Taliban"

Hint to the editor who wrote that headline. An Analysis is not a story. It's an opinion. So it should appear on the commentary page. (After reading it, it seems a bad mixture of both news and opinion.)